Posts Tagged Party leaders of the United States Senate

After Demanding Senate Pass A Budget, GOP Refuses To Enter Budget Negotiations | ThinkProgress


After Demanding Senate Pass A Budget, GOP Refuses To Enter Budget Negotiations

House Republicans spent most of their time over the last three years reminding Americans that Senate Democrats hadn’t passed a budget in two, then three, then four years. It was a regular Republican talking point, a particular favorite of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s. But now that the Senate has returned to regular order by passing a budget, House Republicans are refusing to come to the table to negotiate a long-term spending plan.

Republicans passed their own budget, the plan Ryan authored, in March, and since the proposal differs from the Senate budget, regular order requires the two chambers to come together in conference to iron out their differences in a compromise budget that is then taken back to the full memberships of each house. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has hinted at forming such a conference for more than a week, but Republicans have shown no willingness to join him. This morning, Senate Republicans blocked Reid from creating a conference committee, a move that led Reid to accuse them of turning “a complete 180″:

It seems House Republicans don’t want to be seen even discussing the possibility of compromise with the Democrats for fear of a Tea Party revolt,” Reid said.

He noted that Republicans have called for “regular order” for years.

“A strange thing happened: House Republicans did a complete 180 — they flipped. They’re no longer interested in regular order even though they preached that for years,” Reid said.

The GOP offered numerous excuses for why they wouldn’t approve a conference, including that certain rules need to be worked out. Ryan and Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions (R), the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, have said they need to agree to “framework” for a deal to make a compromise more likely.

What that “framework” would need to be to get Republicans to agree to conference, however, is clear: a deal that cuts spending but includes no new tax revenue. That has been a consistent GOP demand throughout budget and spending fights over the last three years, a sticking point that has brought the government to the brink of both shutdown and default. It’s also a concession Democrats and President Obama are unwilling to make, given that they have already agreed to nearly $2.5 trillion in spending cuts while receiving little revenue in exchange. Any new deal, in fact, would have to achieve 90 percent of its deficit reduction from tax revenue to balance the overall reductions achieved in the last four years.

 After Demanding Senate Pass A Budget, GOP Refuses To Enter Budget Negotiations | ThinkProgress.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

AG Holder: ‘We Will Not Sit By’ While Republicans Rig The Electoral College | ThinkProgress


AG Holder: ‘We Will Not Sit By’ While Republicans Rig The Electoral College


Attorney General Eric Holder has a solid record on voting rights, and he’s criticized Republican state lawmaker’s efforts to restrict the franchise in the past — at one point comparing voter ID laws to an unconstitutional poll tax. At a speech in New York yesterday, Holder added a new line to his previous attacks on voter suppression, suggesting that DOJ will respond with legal action if any Republican state lawmakers move forward with their proposals to rig the Electoral College:

Long lines are unnecessary. Shortened voting periods are unwise and inconsistent with the historic ideal of expanded participation in the process.Recent proposed changes in how electoral votes are apportioned in specific states are blatantly partisan, unfair, divisive, and not worthy of our nation. Let me be clear again: we will not sit by and allow the slow unraveling of an electoral system that so many sacrificed so much to construct.

There are two versions of the GOP’s election rigging plans, both of which Republicans want to enact exclusively in blue states. One version would allocate electoral votes in several targeted blue states by Congressional district, rather than to the winner of the state as a whole. The other version, which is currently being pushed by Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi (R), would allocate electoral votes proportionally — so that Mitt Romney would have won a significant chunk of Pennsylvania’s electoral voters even though President Obama carried the state. As with the congressional districts plan, Pileggi’s election-rigging plan would give away electoral votes to Republicans in his blue state, while still keeping all red state electors in GOP hands:

Holder’s suggestion that he would bring the full weight of the Department of Justice down upon any state that tried to steal the White House is certainly welcome, although it alone will not be enough to stop these election-rigging plans. Ultimately, the Justice Department’s ability to protect voting rights depends on a Supreme Court that is not openly hostile to the franchise — and the Roberts Court’s contempt for voting rights pervades their decisions. If the GOP election-rigging plans are to be defeated, it will require citizens in states like Pennsylvania raising their voice in outrage at this blatant attempt to steal American democracy.

 AG Holder: ‘We Will Not Sit By’ While Republicans Rig The Electoral College | ThinkProgress.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Washington Celebrates Solving Totally Unnecessary Crisis They Created : The New Yorker


The Borowitz Report

 

JANUARY 1, 2013

WASHINGTON CELEBRATES SOLVING TOTALLY UNNECESSARY CRISIS THEY CREATED

POSTED BY ANDY BOROWITZ

 

 

 

mcconnell-465.jpg

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Official Washington was in celebration mode on New Year’s Day after kind of averting a completely unnecessary crisis that was entirely of its own creation.

“This deal proves that if we all procrastinate long and hard enough, we can semi-solve any self-inflicted problem at the very last minute in a way that satisfies no one,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky).

But even as Sen. McConnell basked in self-congratulation, he warned Congress against the complacency that could come with having sort of fixed its own completely avoidable mess.

“This is a new year, and much work remains to be done,” he said. “It’s up to us to concoct entirely new optional disasters that we will have to undo at some later date in a more or less half-assed way.”

In a related story, an arsonist received an award for putting out his own fire.

Washington Celebrates Solving Totally Unnecessary Crisis They Created : The New Yorker.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Senate Outraged at Having to Work Weekend to Save Nation : The New Yorker


The Borowitz Report

 

DECEMBER 30, 2012

SENATE OUTRAGED AT HAVING TO WORK WEEKEND TO SAVE NATION

POSTED BY ANDY BOROWITZ

 

 

us-capitol-boro-465.jpg

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Howls of protest filled the halls of the U.S. Senate today as dozens of Senators expressed their outrage at having to work through the weekend to save the United States from financial Armageddon.

“We’re hearing a lot about the country plunging back into recession and millions of people being thrown out of work,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky). “What we’re not hearing much about is how our Sunday is being completely and irrevocably ruined.”

Senator McConnell said that when President Obama called the Senate back to work on a budget deal this weekend, “At first I thought he was kidding. Not only have I never worked on a weekend, I’ve never met anyone who’s done such a damn fool thing.”

The Senate Minority Leader added that “if saving this country means working Saturday and Sunday, then I’m not sure this is a country worth saving.”

“Yes, I know that the fiscal cliff is a ticking time bomb that could destroy the U.S. economy for years to come and take the rest of the world with it,” he said. “I also know that Sunday is Week seventeen of the N.F.L. season and now I’m missing all my games.”

Mr. McConnell said that while “saving the nation may be important to be some people,” he worries that forcing the Senate to work on a weekend is setting a dangerous precedent.

“For years, people have run for Congress because they knew that serving here was synonymous with not working,” he said. “If that’s going to change all of a sudden, a lot of us are going to feel very betrayed.”

Senate Outraged at Having to Work Weekend to Save Nation : The New Yorker.

 

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Optimism for fiscal deal grows ahead of White House meeting – The Hill


The Hill Newspaper

Optimism for fiscal deal grows ahead of White House meeting

By Alexander Bolton 12/28/12 12:09 PM ET

  

Senators are growing more optimistic of a deal to avoid part of the fiscal cliff as Senate Republican Mitch McConnell (Ky.) works with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and President Obama to craft a last-minute deal.

The president will meet with McConnell, Reid, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) at the White House at 3 p.m. Friday.

Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.) said the White House meeting could accelerate negotiations among the president and Senate leaders.

“I don’t think much comes out of this meeting per se, but the preparation for the meeting and some of the things that are said in it could cause case other conversations to occur. That is generally the way these things work,” he said.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the Senate’s third-ranking Democrat, said on the “Today” show Friday that leaders are closer to a potential deal than many people in Washington think.

A senior Senate Democratic aide said if McConnell wants to raise the threshold for extending the Bush-era income tax rates to $400,000 — up from the $250,000 cutoff Obama campaigned on — Democrats would like to see unemployment insurance benefits, a freeze in scheduled cuts to doctors’ Medicare payments, and a package of “tax extenders” added to it. The tax-extender package would address expiring business and renewable energy tax breaks.

Addressing the estate tax rate could be the key to getting Republican and centrist Democratic support for higher income taxes. The estate tax is now set at 35 percent with an exemption of $5 million per spouse. It will leap to 55 percent without congressional action. If a last-minute tax deal extends the estate tax rate at 35 percent or a level lower than the 45 percent rate proposed by the Democratic leadership, it could draw strong Republican support, say GOP senators.

A Democratic aide said any tax package hammered out over the next three days could be the last chance for months to address the estate tax. Democratic senators will discuss what to support at a lunch meeting Friday afternoon.

Republican senators say Boehner is likely to support any deal that attracts broad endorsement from the Senate Republican conference.

Asked if there’s any scenario in which the Senate will agree to something that Boehner would not agree to, Kyl said: “I think that is pretty unlikely. Our effort here is to try and get a result. If you know the House isn’t going to do something than why go through the charade? Then it becomes political gamesmanship.”

“We have said now for quite a long time that the time for that is over. We have to get to a result here. I think everybody recognizes that we are either going to get something in the next few hours or not. There is no more posturing time left,” he added.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) has prepared several backup tax proposals in case Congress goes over the fiscal cliff on Jan. 1, said a Senate aide.

Baucus has worked out these measures as part of an ongoing effort to avoid the fiscal cliff, not in anticipation of President Obama and congressional leaders failing to reach agreement, the aide emphasized.

“He has a number of things he can pull off the bookshelf and insert as needed,” said the aide.

Any legislation introduced after Congress went over the fiscal cliff would have to be tweaked depending on the circumstances.

Senate Finance panel members say Baucus has been preparing policy alternatives for weeks.

“Chairman Baucus has long been talking with Finance members about various ways to proceed,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the committee. “One of the advantages that the Finance Committee provides here is because we’ve looked at a variety of different options, when there’s discussion about a particular course, the Finance Committee, which has worked on a lot of these issues, can in effect dial in numbers.”

 Optimism for fiscal deal grows ahead of White House meeting – The Hill.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

New Fiscal Crisis Talks Set, but Hopes Are Low – NYTimes.com


In Flurry of Activity, Only Muted Hope for Fiscal Deal

By JONATHAN WEISMAN

Published: December 27, 2012 

 

WASHINGTON — President Obama will meet with Congressional leaders on Friday, and House Republicans summoned lawmakers back for a Sunday session, in a last-ditch effort to avert a fiscal crisis brought on by automatic tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to hit next week.

T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times

Senator Harry Reid arrived at the Capitol on Thursday in Washington.

 

Republicans expressed a flicker of hope Thursday that a deal could still be reached to at least avert most of the tax increases on Jan. 1, to prevent a sudden cut in payments to medical providers treating Medicare patients and to extend expiring unemployment benefits. But both parties’ leaders said time is running out.

“Here we are, five days from the New Year, and we might finally start talking,” said Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader.

The overriding emotion Thursday, as senators convened for a rare session between Christmas and New Year’s Day, appeared to be embarrassment. The continuing impasse “demonstrates a tremendous lack of courage here in Washington to address the issues that need to be addressed — at every level,” said Senator Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee.

Lawmakers and aides from both parties cautioned that the burst of activity could be more about making sure the other side gets the blame than any real search for a resolution before the Jan. 1 deadline. Under Senate rules, no deal could run the gantlet of procedural hurdles in time for a final vote before the deadline without all the senators agreeing not to slow progress.

“I have to be very honest,” Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, said Thursday. “I don’t know timewise how it can happen now.”

White House officials continued to put the onus on Republicans to clear a procedural path to a quick vote on a negotiated deal.

“The only way America goes over the cliff is if the Republican leaders in the House and the Senate decide to push us by blocking passage of bills to extend tax cuts or the middle class,” said the White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer. “It’s a question of their willingness to put country before party.”

Republicans said there was nothing preventing Mr. Reid from putting formal legislation on the Senate floor, and to date, no such bill has been written.

But the contours of a fallback deal did come into view Thursday, even as the will to achieve it lagged behind.

Republicans involved in the talks said both sides would probably be able to agree to extend expiring Bush-era tax cuts up to some income threshold higher than Mr. Obama’s $250,000 cutoff but lower than the $1 million sought by the House speaker, John A. Boehner. To that, leaders would probably agree to add provisions to stop thealternative minimum tax from suddenly enlarging to hit more middle class households, and possibly to extend expiring unemployment benefits.

Republicans would be far less receptive to Mr. Obama’s call to temporarily suspend across-the-board spending cuts unless such a suspension was accompanied by significant and immediate spending cuts elsewhere.

But no such deal could be reached without significant, face-to-face negotiations between the president, Senate leaders and House leaders, aides said. McConnell aides said a phone call between the president and the Senate Republican leader Wednesday night was the first outreach Mr. McConnell has had from any Democrat since Thanksgiving.

“It appears to me the action, if there is any, will be on the Senate side,” Mr. McConnell said Thursday afternoon on the Senate floor.

After a House Republican leadership conference call on Thursday, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the majority leader, announced that House members would return to Washington on Sunday for legislative business, with votes in the evening. Lawmakers were warned that the House might be in session through Jan. 2, the day the 112th Congress disbands. The next day, the 113th Congress will convene, wiping out any unfinished work of the past two years.

Between such glimmers of hope, the talk in Washington on Thursday was anything but conciliatory. Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 House Democrat, said Republicans would use an imminent fight over raising the government’s statutory borrowing limit to fight for big spending cuts, and compared that to taking one’s own child hostage and threatening to kill it.

On the Senate floor Thursday, Mr. Reid excoriated House Republicans for failing to consider a Senate-passed measure that would extend lower tax rates on household income up to $250,000. He urged House members to return to the Capitol to put together at least a modest deal to avoid the more than a half-trillion dollars in automatic tax increases and spending cuts set to begin in January.

“The American people are waiting for the ball to drop,” Mr. Reid said, “but it’s not going to be a good drop.”

 New Fiscal Crisis Talks Set, but Hopes Are Low – NYTimes.com.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Spoiling for a filibuster fight – The Washington Post


Katrina vanden Heuvel

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Opinion Writer

Spoiling for a filibuster fight

By Katrina vanden Heuvel, Published: December 4

Perhaps it was inevitable that a parliamentary rule named after pirates would metastasize into an untamed menace. 

Throughout its unlikely history, the filibuster has been – depending on the moment – lauded and scorned and even immortalized by Hollywood. A Senate relic, dry as parchment, has gained the sort of colorful reputation normally reserved for troubled starlets (or troubled generals).

Now, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid proposes, as others have in the past, to finally rein in the beast. It won’t be easy. Previous efforts to change the filibuster have failed in the face of opposition from whichever party is in the minority and fearful of losing their right to stand up to – and in the way of – majority will.

But this time might be different, because the 113th Congress will be different.

Ms. Warren — that’s newly elected Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts — is coming to Washington. She and several of her incoming colleagues are fed up with filibuster abuse, and they will join a group of sitting senators committed to reform.

It’s about time. The filibuster, which allows the minority party to hold up Senate business by requiring a 60-vote threshold, has technically been around since departing Vice President/assassin Aaron Burr pleaded with his colleagues to clean up the rule books.

Over the years, there have been plenty of examples – from the unconscionable (a century-long refusal by Southern senators to pass any civil rights legislation) to the entertaining (New York Republican Al D’Amato’s 15-hour attempt, ending in song, to save a typewriter plant) – of senators holding the floor to make a point.

But more recently, the Senate’s Republican minority has used the filibuster to demand 60 votes, not just for some legislation, but for all of it. The group has threatened to filibuster 348 times in the six years since Democrats took the majority. In fact, 2009-2010 saw more filibusters than in the 1950s and 60s combined. The result is a non-functioning Senate, where critical legislation, from the Jobs Act to the Dream Act, and urgent judicial appointments, die in a tangled web of grossly misused procedure.

Even worse, filibustering senators no longer have to stay on the floor and talk. The public’s perception – Jimmy Stewart giving a 24-hour uninterrupted, impassioned defense of his views – is just Hollywood fantasy. One worthy exception was when Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) launched something like a real filibuster against the 2010 tax deal, delivering a stirring speech on behalf of working families.

To change all this, Reid wants to eliminate the 60-vote requirement to start debate on a bill and to require senators who filibuster to stay on the floor and speak. These commonsense reforms would, it is hoped, induce senators to conduct the people’s work. Why, after all, do we need more than a simple majority to just talk about a bill?

Moreover, the proposed changes could restore a level of honesty and transparency to Senate debate, allowing people to hear the very minority views the filibuster is supposed to protect. Reinstating what is called the talking filibuster might also help eliminate the backroom maneuvering that is the hallmark of congressional obstruction.

This could boost a body whose approval ratings last year were worse than Paris Hilton’s and BP’s during the oil spill. As Warren recently argued, the American people are tired of roadblocks and gridlock – they want solutions.

There is, of course, opposition. Reid intends to use a unique window of time on the first day of the new Congress to change the filibuster rules, using only 51 votes. While even some longtime Democrats are anxious about this method, Republicans have taken their act to a whole new level of melodrama. Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell blustered that using this so-called “nuclear” option would herald the apocalypse, forcing him to bring Senate business to a halt — as though this would be a departure from his current course.

The feigned hysteria over mere reform is a good sign. It means that GOP obstructionists are genuinely concerned that they won’t be able to hold up the Senate’s most basic work without putting any skin in the game. They’re worried that they’ll have to, as Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) helpfully put it, “park your fanny on the floor” and perhaps even explain their opposition.

No less a Founding Father than Alexander Hamilton warned against requiring a supermajority for basic action, predicting “tedious delays; continual negotiation and intrigue; contemptible compromises of the public good.” Little did he know that he was presciently, perfectly describing the modern Senate.

Our system, by design, protects minority voices, but it doesn’t sanction stalemate.

Fortunately, when the curtain comes up on the new Congress, a group of senators will be ready to vote for change. Even President Obama has come out in support of Reid’s proposed, modest reforms, and the Fix the Senate Now coalition is mobilizing members of the public to urge their senators to do the same.

“The public business must in some way or other go forward,” Hamilton wrote 225 years ago. Come January, at long last, it might.

 Spoiling for a filibuster fight – The Washington Post.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Obama, Congressional leaders upbeat after talks – Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq – Army Times


Obama, Congressional leaders upbeat after talks

 

By John T. Bennett – Staff writer
Posted : Friday Nov 16, 2012 14:10:43 EST

President Barack Obama and congressional leaders struck an upbeat tone following the opening round of talks about avoiding the so-called fiscal cliff, and deep, across-the-board defense cuts.

The Nov. 16 talks came 46 days before massive cuts to planned federal domestic and defense programs would kick in unless Congress sends the president a $1.2 trillion deficit-reduction plan he is willing to sign. If lawmakers and Obama fail, a $500 billion, decade-spanning cut to planned military spending would take effect Jan. 2.

In a statement issued shortly after the first round of talks, the White House called the negotiations “constructive,” adding Obama and the leaders of the House and Senate “agreed to do everything possible to find a solution that averts the so-called fiscal cliff.”

All eyes are focused on these efforts because economists of all political stripes say if those cuts — done without strategic calculations — are triggered at the same time a slew of tax cuts also expire, the American economy would tumble into its second deep recession in five years. Pentagon officials, hawkish lawmakers and analysts also warn the nonstrategic nature of the military cuts would hurt national security, though some experts disagree.

“Both sides agreed that while there may be differences in our preferred approaches, we will continue a constructive process to find a solution and come to a conclusion as soon as possible,” the White House said.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said after exiting the White House that he laid out a “framework” that focuses on “reforming our tax code and reforming our spending.” Boehner added he believes his framework is consistent with the “balanced approach” the president and congressional Democrats are demanding.

“To show our seriousness, we’ve put revenue on the table as long as it’s accompanied by significant spending cuts,” Boehner told reporters. The speaker said he is “confident” about a deal.

“I feel very good about what we were able to talk about in there,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “We have the cornerstones of being able to work something out. We’re both going to have to give up some of the things that we know are a problem.”

During the hour-long meeting, “we had a recognition that every person in America knows that we must reach an agreement,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Boehner reiterated his longtime stance that a so-called grand bargain deal that reforms the tax code, alters domestic entitlement programs and cuts other federal spending — while also raising new revenues — will have to wait until the new Congress is seated next year. More time will be needed to complete such a comprehensive package than is available in the remaining month of the lame duck Congress, Boehner and others said.

But Pelosi said she also thinks it is important that “we send a message of confidence to consumers, to the markets, in the short run, too.

“We should have a goal in terms of how much deficit-reduction,” Pelosi said. “We should have a deadline before Christmas. We should show some milestones of success so that confidence can build as we reach our solution.”

Notably, she said, “It has to be about cuts. It has to be about revenue. It has to be about growth. It has to be about the future.”

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell said federal entitlements must be reformed to match the changing demographics of the nation, but he also called for big federal spending cuts.

Reid said the quartet is slated to huddle again with Obama the week of Nov. 26, when Congress returns from its weeklong Thanksgiving recess. Obama is slated to travel to Asia from Nov. 17-19. The White House said senior aides will continue talking to congressional leaders about the construct of a deal.

 Obama, Congressional leaders upbeat after talks – Army News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq – Army Times.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Romney campaign unable to shake Democratic attacks on tax records – The Hill’s Ballot Box


 

http://thehill.com/templates/thehill/images/space.gif

Romney campaign unable to shake Democratic attacks on tax records

By Cameron Joseph - 08/06/12 05:00 AM ET

  

Republicans are pushing back strongly against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) claims that Mitt Romney had failed to pay taxes for multiple years, but the controversy and Democratic pressure on the GOP candidate to release more of his tax records shows little sign of dying down.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) both took to the Sunday morning talk shows to accuse Reid of “lying.” But despite the GOP criticism, the Romney campaign appeared unable to move past the debate over the presumptive nominee’s personal finances.

“As far as Harry Reid is concerned, listen, I know you might want to go down that road, I’m not going to respond to a dirty liar who hasn’t filed a single page of tax returns himself, complains about people with money but lives in the Ritz Carlton here down the street,” Priebus said when asked about Reid’s claim that a Bain Capital investor had told him Romney had gone 10 years without paying income taxes.

“So if that’s on the agenda, I’m not going to go there. This is just a made-up issue. And the fact that we’re going to spend any time talking about it is ridiculous,” Priebus added.

But talk did focus on the issue — and while Democrats avoided embracing Reid’s specific claims, the discussion gave them the chance to hammer Romney once again for his refusal to release more than two years of tax returns for public scrutiny.

“The Romney campaign and Gov. Romney can resolve this in 10 seconds — they can release the tax returns,” top Obama adviser David Axelrod said when asked on Fox News Sunday about Reid’s comments. “They gave 23 years of tax returns [to the] John McCain campaign [in 2008], they’ve given one year of tax returns to the American people. … Why don’t they just put this to rest? Why is he hiding?”

The situation is a lose-lose for Romney, some Republican strategists say. They fear the attacks are likely to continue as long as Romney doesn’t release additional returns. But they also caution that Democrats found plenty to attack in the tax returns Romney did put out, including offshore bank accounts in Switzerland and the Cayman Islands. Romney has said he won’t release additional returns to provide more fodder for Democratic attacks.

One GOP strategist also warns that hitting back at Reid fails to damage Romney’s real opponent in the run up to the November election: President Obama.

“They’re trying to fight back at Reid so it backfires on Obama. What makes Reid such a dangerous weapon is he doesn’t care,” GOP strategist Ford O’Connell told The Hill. “Reid is putting Romney in a tough situation. When you’re slapping back at Harry Reid it keeps the issue in the public eye. They’re going to have to make a determination of how much longer they want to keep sticking to their guns.”

O’Connell, though, suggests a cautious approach for the Romney camp.

“There may come a time when they do need to release those tax returns but they need to play this one out first,” he advised.

Romney has personally responded to Reid’s attacks, calling on the Senate majority leader to “put up or shut up” earlier in the week, and a number of people on both sides of the aisle have criticized Reid for his unverified accusations.

But the Nevada senator has also gleefully refused to back down, and shown he’s willing to take the heat in order to keep Romney’s taxes in the news.

The eagerness of Team Obama to continue hitting Romney on taxes this weekend also suggests that the campaign sees little risk of blowback against the president himself from Reid’s charges.

The former Massachusetts governor has faced questions on the issue for months — his GOP primary opponents criticized him for failing to disclose his taxes and Democrats have harped on it in their effort to make his wealth a major campaign issue.

While Republicans blasted Reid for his unsubstantiated claims, others also acknowledged Sunday that the ongoing fight is hurting Romney. 

Top GOP strategist Ed Rollins said on Fox News that questions about what is in Romney’s tax returns would continue through the fall if he didn’t release more years — a sentiment previously voiced by other Republicans including Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R), Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol and conservative columnist George Will.

“I think at this point of time it’s going to dog him all the way and he needs to get it behind him,” said Rollins, who managed the presidential campaigns of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) and worked on former President Reagan’s reelection team. “I think he needs to release more taxes. Absolutely.”

“I would not put out 20 years and I obviously wouldn’t respond to anything Harry Reid states,” he said. “At the end of the day you come to the point where you basically give a little bit more and you move forward. And he’s going to do that. Two years is not enough, obviously.”

 

Romney campaign unable to shake Democratic attacks on tax records – The Hill’s Ballot Box.

 

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Why Harry Reid keeps attacking Mitt Romney – Manu Raju – POLITICO.com


 

Why Harry Reid keeps attacking Mitt Romney

Harry Reid is pictured. | Jay Westcott/POLITICO

‘He literally could not care less,’ a Reid confidante said. | Jay Westcott/POLITICO

Close 

 

By MANU RAJU | 8/3/12 6:29 PM EDT Updated: 8/5/12 3:17 PM EDT

Jon Stewart called Harry Reid “a really, really terrible person” for his unsubstantiated allegation that Mitt Romney hadn’t paid taxes for 10 years. Mitch McConnell said it was “beneath the dignity” of the majority leader’s office to make such a charge.

And conservative commentators are calling on Reid to put his money where his mouth is and release his own tax returns.

The ruthless Senate majority leader sees political gold in his attack on Romney — and he’s got the blessing from President Barack Obama’s campaign for the attack, even if he lacks evidence on Romney’s failure to pay taxes.

Reid has calculated that the frenzy created by his charge has accomplished exactly what he sought to do: Turn the focus back onto the GOP nominee’s unreleased tax returns, according to several people close to the leader and the campaign. For Reid, he’s got virtually nothing to lose: His approval ratings back home are still upside-down, and he may not even run for reelection when he’s up for a sixth term in 2016.

On top of that, his aides say, Reid genuinely believes his source — an old friend and longtime investor at Romney’s former company Bain Capital — who told the Senate majority leader a couple months back that the GOP nominee didn’t pay taxes for at least a decade.

Despite the uproar and the lack of additional evidence to present, Reid isn’t going to stop talking about Romney’s taxes.

“What’s the downside? Jon Stewart getting all serious and haughty? Harry Reid could not care less,” said one Reid confidante. “There is no one in politics with a thicker skin. He’s having the last laugh. Reid’s strategy is working. It’s filling news holes and driving conversations.”

One downside for Reid is that this could be the start of a poisonous relationship between the country’s two most powerful Mormon politicians, something that could make it profoundly more difficult to establish trust and cut deals in a narrowly divided Congress — if Romney wins the White House.

Asked if the Obama campaign agreed with Reid’s comments, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said: “Reflecting the growing number of questions Americans have about Mitt Romney’s finances, Sen. Reid rightfully pointed out that Gov. Romney has something to hide.”

In the short term, Romney has been forced to respond to Reid’s accusation, as he did in Reid’s backyard of Las Vegas on Friday, taking attention away from a mixed July jobs report and the GOP attacks on the president’s economic record.

“I have paid taxes every year, and a lot of taxes, so Harry is wrong,” Romney said at a news conference. “Harry Reid has to put up or shut up. Harry, who are your sources?”

(Also on POLITICO: Reid: ‘Extremely credible source’ said Romney didn’t pay taxes for decade)

Obama and Reid have developed a close partnership during the president’s time in office, as the two have increasingly coordinated the Senate’s agenda to match the campaign rhetoric. And Reid, an ultimate loyalist, benefited mightily from Obama’s aggressive effort in 2010 to help the majority leader pull off a hard-fought reelection battle many thought he had no chance of winning.

Now, Reid is driving Obama’s political message, as he did in a missive Friday, telling his supporters in an email that he’s “not backing down” from his allegations that Romney didn’t pay taxes for 10 years and that voters “can’t let Mitt Romney get away” with “hiding” his tax returns.

“Gov. Romney has told me to ‘put up or shut up’ — but he’s the one who shut up when people asked legitimate questions about his finances, and it’s up to him to put up his taxes so we can see the answers,” Reid said in the email.

Reid has a penchant for enraging Republicans — whether it’s his vitriolic rhetoric (calling George W. Bush a “loser” or Alan Greenspan “one of the biggest political hacks”) or refusal to allow Republicans to offer amendments in the Senate. And this instance is no different, with Romney’s top adviser, Eric Fehrnstrom, questioning whether the senator had “no decency” and Romney furiously refuting the charges for two days in a row, calling them “dishonest.”

But according to several people close to the majority leader, that’s exactly what Reid wants.

“What Republicans don’t get is the more they fire back at Reid, the more he will fight,” said another top Reid confidante. “And in the end, what will the topic be? Romney and his taxes.”

Reid initially acknowledged to The Huffington Post that he’s not “certain” that the information is correct. But that hasn’t stopped him from repeating the charge to Nevada reporters, saying on the Senate floor that the “word is out” that Romney hadn’t paid taxes for a decade. He expanded on his allegation in a lengthy statement Thursday night that accused Romney of “hiding something” by not releasing more of his tax returns.

“He’s doing what he always does,” said Jon Ralston, a top political analyst in Nevada, “which is to say the things that most partisans and elected officials only dream about saying.”

Reid — a millionaire who owns a condo at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington — has a history of foot-in-the-mouth gaffes that tend to cause him and his staff much embarrassment. The most notable incident came in January 2010 in the book “Game Change,” in which he referred to Obama as having a “light-skinned” appearance who spoke “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,” something Reid believed helped him win the presidency in 2008. Reid went on a multi-day public apology tour to clean up the political mess.

But the latest episode is no gaffe, his advisers say. It’s a deliberate attempt to spotlight the fact that Romney has released his tax returns only for 2010 — when he paid an effective rate of 13.9 percent — and his plans to release only his 2011 returns in October. Democrats believe Romney — whose personal fortune is estimated to be up to $250 million — would be seen as out of touch if he releases more tax returns. If he doesn’t, they can pound him for being secretive.

“His poor father must be so embarrassed about his son,” Reid told The Huffington Post, referring to George Romney’s presidential run in 1968, when he released 12 years of tax returns.

On “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,” Stewart tore apart Reid, calling him a “terrible” person and calling it a “bull sh-t shot.”

“I cannot believe you just went dead dad shame on Mitt Romney,” Stewart said.

Asked how Reid was responding to such criticism, a third person close to Reid shrugged it off entirely.

“It’s impossible to say how little he cares,” the Reid confidante said. “He literally could not care less.”

 Why Harry Reid keeps attacking Mitt Romney – Manu Raju – POLITICO.com.

 

, , , , , , ,

4 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 265 other followers

%d bloggers like this: