Posts Tagged MICHAEL REAGAN
Cagle Post – Political Cartoons & Commentary – » Junk Laws
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Government, Opinion, Perspective on January 11, 2013
Making Sense, by Michael Reagan
We have junk food, junk mail and junk bonds.
Now, thanks to our dysfunctional and devious Congress, we have junk laws like the “Taxpayer Relief Act.”
Junk laws are really nothing new. The people we send to Washington to represent us have been passing legislation larded with pork or special privileges for their friends in business, agriculture and labor since the country was born.

Adam Zyglis / Buffalo News
Insiders have always known how this cynical bipartisan game is played. But now, thanks to the failure of Congress to deal with the government debt crisis it in large part created, the average American is starting to become aware of these junk bills.
Even the liberal media were outraged by what went on when Congress passed the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012″ — which, ironically, raised the taxes of every working American by 2 percent by returning the Social Security tax to its usual 6.2 percent level.
The “Fiscal Cliff Bill” did virtually nothing to solve the federal government’s money problems or create a single job. But it was junked up with nearly $70 billion of pure pork — including tax credits for the owners of NASCAR racetracks, wind turbine makers, Hollywood moviemakers and rum-makers in Puerto Rico.
While President Obama was promising to raise taxes on the rich but really shafting the working poor, congressional folk were so busy loading up the “Fiscal Cliff Bill” with presents for their friends that they forgot to pass the relief bill to benefit victims of Hurricane Sandy.
Members of Congress are grandmasters of deceit and dishonesty. Taking maximum advantage of every crisis or disaster that comes along, they attach their favorite pieces of pork to dishonestly named bills such as the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012″ and the “Affordable Healthcare Act.”
Members know these big important super-bills have to pass to avert a crisis, so they junk them up with their $200 million “Bridges to Nowhere” and their $59 million tax credits for the algae-growing industry.
A perfect example of how Congress gets its junk bills passed has to with the way it funds FEMA. Congress always underfunds the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Why?
Because Congress knows each year there will always be a natural disaster like Hurricane Sandy that FEMA will need billions of federal dollars to address.
And when FEMA comes asking for emergency funding, members of Congress will clean out their closets and throw every piece of junk legislation they have into the relief bill, which they know will automatically pass without scrutiny.
Another reason we get junk laws is that few members of Congress actually read these monster bills before they vote for them. Nancy Pelosi’s career quote is going to be her comment on the healthcare bill, “But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it.”
Law-making is not supposed to work that way. There’s a rule in Congress that a bill has to be posted for 48 hours before it can be voted on. But that rule has become a joke.
Just watch C-SPAN the next time a vote is being taken in the House. You’ll probably hear someone say something like, “Under suspension of the rule, we’ll now vote.”
What arcane parliamentary rule are they talking about? The 48-hour rule. No wonder Congress is always finding out after they vote what they just voted for. If members of Congress don’t read the damn bill, they shouldn’t vote on it.
I’m getting real tired of people saying, “My guy’s a good guy and your guy’s a bad guy.” They’re all acting like bad guys.
We need to start holding every member of Congress accountable. And we need more up-and-down votes in Congress, so that the next important piece of legislation doesn’t become another “Fiscal Cliff Junk Bill.”
Cagle Post – Political Cartoons & Commentary – » Junk Laws.
Related articles
- Congress to vote on Sandy aid as FEMA warns funds low (cnn.com)
- Sandy Shows Disaster-Relief Funding Is a Disaster – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
- Sandy Relief Bill Filled With $9 Billion of Pork (theburningplatform.com)
- Voting Against Sandy Relief is the Only Moral Option (txwclp.org)
- Long funding process to follow irate Sandy rhetoric (nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com)
- The Pork Filled and Expensive Non-Relief Sandy Relief Bill (conservativeread.com)
- HARD TO ARGUE: Taxpayer Advocate Says Tax Code is “Unconscionable Burden,” Suggests Junking the… (pjmedia.com)
- House passes $9.7B Sandy relief bill (cbsnews.com)
- Republican Congressman Says He’s Not Convinced Sandy Victims Need Relief (politicususa.com)
- Not So Fast, Governor Christie (personalliberty.com)
Cagle Post – Political Cartoons & Commentary – » Restoring Confidence
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Opinion, Perspective on December 8, 2012
Making Sense, by Michael Reagan
Help us, we’re falling and we can’t get up again.
Once upon a time — in 1988 and 1998 to be exact — the United States was the best country for a baby to be born and raised in, at least according to The Economist magazine.

Eric Allie / PoliticalCartoons.com
But the 2013 edition of the magazine’s “where-to-be-born” index has us down at No. 16 — tied with Germany and one spot ahead of the United Arab Emirates.
Switzerland, Australia, Norway, Sweden and Denmark — nice countries but not exactly world famous as destinations for millions of people seeking opportunity — are ranked 1 through 5.
The Economist’s annual ranking tries to quantify what country “will provide the best opportunities for a healthy, safe and prosperous life in the years ahead.”
It crunches and weighs the numbers for 11 indicators — everything from geography and demography to GDP per capita, the cost of living and future economic growth prospects. And, unfortunately for the United States, it weighs government debt.
The Economist doesn’t factor a debt-related reason America will likely continue to slide in these rankings — no one today has any confidence in our political leaders to solve our economic problems.
Our economy is stuck on a reef. Growth is too low. The prospects of a real recovery coming anytime soon are dim and getting dimmer, not brighter.
It’s so bad, even illegal aliens are losing confidence in America and leaving the country. And Citigroup just announced it is laying off 11,000 employees. Obviously, its bosses don’t have much hope for a better future, either.
Back in the 1980s, we had more confidence in our political leaders because they actually earned it from time to time.
When my father was in the White House and Democrats controlled Congress, both parties fought bitterly with each other.
But when it came time to work out a solution to get the economy moving forward, they sat down and cut deals to lower or simplify taxes and to ease or eliminate onerous regulations.
In the 1990s, the roles were reversed. Clinton was president, Republicans ran Congress and partisanship was fierce. But when they had to do it, the leaders of both parties worked out a way to balance the budget and reform welfare.
In the old days, conservatives and liberals — loyal R’s and die-hard D’s — buried their hatchets and ultimately found a way to work together.
Today, we don’t seem to even want both parties to cooperate. We demonize the other side so much we can’t imagine ever working with them to fix the Capitol Building’s roof, much less the economy.
Fast-forward to 2012. Does anyone have confidence in our leaders to work together to pull the Supertanker of State off the reef, much less turn it around?
We know what makes America work better for everyone today and in the future — or we used to. It’s when government is smaller and the private sector is bigger, not vice versa.
The American people have lost confidence in their leaders for good reasons. Politicians from both parties in Washington have to join to clean up the economic mess they created or that confidence will never be restored.
If they don’t do it soon, being ranked No. 16 on The Economist’s “best place to be born” index will look pretty good to our grandkids.
Cagle Post – Political Cartoons & Commentary – » Restoring Confidence.
Related articles
- Michael Reagan on His Father’s 1985 Thanksgiving Address: He Believed ‘When We Cease to Be a Nation Under God, We’ll Be a Nation Gone Under’ (foxnewsinsider.com)
- Rousseff Rebuffs Economist Magazine Call to Oust Finance Chief – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
- The Eyes Of A Hero; Washington State Artist Puts A Face On The War In Iraq And Afghanistan (khq.com)
- Renewable energy country attractiveness indices (energment.wordpress.com)
- Republican Suckers (Guest Voice) (themoderatevoice.com)
- Cagle Post – Political Cartoons & Commentary – ” GOP Turns Sure Victory into Defeat (mbcalyn.com)
- Michael Reagan Slams GOP: They Talk About Ronald Reagan, But They Haven’t Really Embraced Him (mediaite.com)
- Restoring Confidence (conservativeread.com)
- GOP Turns Sure Victory into Defeat (Guest Voice) (themoderatevoice.com)
- 10 Most Commonly Used Professional Buzzwords According to LinkedIn [Infographic] (thetechnologycafe.com)
Cagle Post » Chevy Volt : Solyndra on Wheels
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Opinion on September 13, 2012
Chevy Volt : Solyndra on Wheels
Making Sense, by Michael Reagan
“I absolutely love my Chevy Volt.”
That’s what the smug guy in the TV commercial says when he’s praising the virtues of his plug-in hybrid and boasting that he hasn’t seen a gas pump in months.
You might love your Chevy Volt, too — if you could afford to buy one.

Mike Keefe / PoliticalCartoons.com
The GM Volt, aka the Green Edsel, is not just an overly engineered, overly expensive, overweight and impractical car than runs on electricity and gasoline.
It’s a Solyndra on Wheels. The Volt only exists because it’s been so heavily discounted by GM and subsidized by the federal government.
So far the Volt has cost Government Motors about twice as much per car to develop and make than its sticker price, which is $40,000. On top of that savings, the consumer gets a $7,500 federal tax credit for being so green — or maybe so naive.
Yet the Volt’s ultimate price — $32,500 for what is essentially an electrified and souped-up $17,000 Chevy Cruze — is still so high that only those in the top 7 percent of all income earners will buy it.
The average per capita income of Volt buyers is $172,000 — the income bracket that usually drives a BMW or a Mercedes.
In other words, the average American — who makes less than $40,000 a year — is subsidizing a bunch of rich people so they can hug themselves for saving the planet (by buying a car that runs for about 35 miles on electricity generated by coal-fired power plants before Exxon premium gas has to take over).
Despite these subsidies and low-cost lease deals, Volt sales so far in 2012 are 13,500, far below the 45,000 cars GM hoped to sell this year in America alone.
Experts say GM will have to sell about 120,000 Volts in five years to begin covering its development costs. Good luck, GM. I don’t think there are that many celebrities in Hollywood who need a third car.
After Romney replaces Obama this fall, let’s hope he’ll pull the government plug on the Volt and concentrate on making us energy independent.
Killing the Volt and any other electric-car boondoggles would be a good thing, and not just because it’d save money the federal government doesn’t have. The popularity of electric-propelled cars that raise miles-per-gallon averages has given some of our more “progressive” governments some dangerous ideas.
State and local governments worry that if gasoline sales decline they’ll be deprived of billions of dollars in revenue from gas taxes that now are used to maintain roads or subsidize mass transit.
To make up for lost revenues from hybrids and electric cars in the future, Oregon and San Francisco already have been looking into the idea of charging drivers a tax per each mile driven.
Cars would be fitted with GPS navigation systems that track how far they drive. Then drivers would be billed accordingly — about a penny a mile, depending on where and when you rack up the mileage.
Needless to say, this Orwellian idea came from Europe, and the Obama administration has been exploring it too.
So let’s see what’s going on here. The government greenies want you to pay extra to drive an electric car that’s more fuel efficient, then they charge you for the miles you drive anyway?
What red-blooded, road-loving American driver wants a government GPS implanted in his car with some bureaucrat looking at it to see how many miles he’s driving?
Not me. I own a Ford Expedition. I get 12.5 miles per gallon. I love it. When it gets too old, I’ll buy a new one.
The government is going to get us one way or the other. I say, go out and buy the biggest damn SUV you want. Enjoy your life. Light a cigar. Step on the gas. And don’t waste a watt on a Volt.
Cagle Post » Chevy Volt : Solyndra on Wheels.
Related articles
- GM is losing $49,000 on every Chevy Volt. (alexrudloff.com)
- Chevy Volt Sells 50% of Production in February (greencarinsider.com)
- The Chevy Volt: Losing Money With Every Sale (snspost.com)
- GM loses almost 50K on each Volt (minbcnews.com)
- Ford Fiesta SFE, Chevy Volt: Great Ways to Feel Good While Breaking Your Bank (buyherenpayhere.com)
- Chevrolet Volt by the Numbers (motortrend.com)
- Chevy Volts, Gun Racks and Newt Gingrich (quickcarquote.com)
- Insight: GM’s Volt – The Ugly Math Of Low Sales, High Costs (tarpon.wordpress.com)
- Chevy Volt: It’s Not Time to Panic (theneteconomy.wordpress.com)
- WaPo Editors Declare Chevy Volt a Flop (newsbusters.org)
Cagle Post » Where Will Washington Stop?
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Opinion, Politics on July 22, 2012
Making Sense, by Michael Reagan
When Chief Justice John Roberts upheld the constitutionality of Obamacare, he didn’t just betray conservatives.
His twisted legal logic also betrayed the American people by opening the door to the largest expansion of federal power since Social Security was enacted.
Roberts and his new liberal soul-mates decided it’s OK for the federal government to tax us if we don’t do what Washington’s bullies and nannies want us to do — or think is good for us.

Eric Allie / Cagle Cartoons
Lord knows, the feds have already taxed us to death — and after death, too — on everything from capital gains to booze. If they can “penalize” us for not buying health care insurance, what’s next?
Tax us if we don’t buy a smaller house? If we don’t buy an electric car? How about if we don’t buy exercise equipment? Or eat broccoli? Or wear Earth Shoes or condoms? There’ll be no end to it.
The principle of limited government — now there’s a quaint 18th-century idea — in Washington has been passe since Calvin Coolidge left town. But as my libertarian friend, Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News said this week, the Obamacare decision has created a new opportunity for unlimited government.
You don’t have to be a constitutional scholar like the judge to know that the Supreme Court has set a horrible precedent. But that judicial train wreck has left Union Station. It’s time to stop whining and get to work.
The only way we can derail Obamacare and the Even Bigger Government Express is by firing the engineer in chief and electing a Congress that will legislatively undo the damage the Supreme Court has done to individual liberty.
It won’t be easy. But the Fourth of July holiday is the perfect time for voters to start another revolution to win back the freedoms our Founding Fathers fought for 236 years ago.
They risked their lives and fortunes to secure liberty for the individual and put government in its place. They knew the only way people can be free is when their government is kept small, weak and fragmented. And when it takes orders from the people instead of the other way around.
We hear precious little praise for the principle of limited government in 2012 America. I’m sorry to say that the last president who had a deep understanding of the proper relationship between government and a free people was my father, Ronald Reagan.
He knew the spirit of freedom had to be kept alive by the people. In a 1961, when his earliest political speeches were arguing against the legislation that eventually created Medicare, he warned us that freedom is not in the DNA of Americans, it is in our hearts and minds.
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
On this Independence Day we need to get fired up about freedom and start fighting for it — at home. Every single American who’s outraged by the Obamacare decision should be energized to show up and vote this fall. And the next dozen falls. If we don’t starting fighting for our freedom now, we deserve to lose it.
Cagle Post » Where Will Washington Stop?.
Related articles
- Where Will Washington Stop? (athomesense.com)
- Judge Andrew Napolitano on How All Three Branches of Government Are Acting Above the Law (reason.com)
- Where Will Washington Stop? (Guest Voice) (themoderatevoice.com)
- Mike Reagan: When will Washington stop? (appeal-democrat.com)
- Judge Andrew Napolitano on How All Three Branches of Government Are Acting Above the Law (txwclp.org)
- Don’t Miss ‘The Tom Sullivan Show’ This Weekend On The FOX BUSINES NETWORK! (radio.foxnews.com)
- Judge Napolitano Predicts That the Supreme Court Will ‘Strike Down’ Obamacare (foxnewsinsider.com)
- Andrew Napolitano on Why the Roberts Ruling on ObamaCare Signals a Turning Point (reason.com)
- The Obamacare Ruling and the Rise of Unlimited Government (ConservativeActionAlerts.com)
- A Clarion Call for the American People (heritage.org)
Cagle Post » Blame Congress for the GSA Scandal
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Opinion, Perspective, Politics on April 19, 2012
Blame Congress for the GSA Scandal
Making Sense, by Michael Reagan
Who should we tar and feather for the scandalous spending spree at that General Services Administration “conference” in Nevada two years ago?
Whose fault is it that a bunch of GSA bureaucrats wasted money on $44 breakfasts, a clown and a $75,000 bicycle-building exercise?

Rick McKee / Augusta Chronicle (click to view more cartoons by McKee)
Not the GSA’s bosses. Not the Obama administration. I pin the blame on Watergate and Congress.
This week Congressional hearings all over Washington have been grilling past and current GSA officials about a $850,000 conference that blew thousands of dollars on things like a mind-reader and “yearbooks” and commemorative coins for the 300 participants.
Everyone from the president to Republican Congressman Darrell Issa of California has expressed outrage at the GSA, which manages the federal government’s property and purchases goods and services for other agencies.
But the source of this scandal isn’t the GSA or its inattentive bosses. They were behaving badly, but they were only doing what they were supposed to — spend every dime Congress gave their agency to spend.
The deeper problem is the way budget money has been allocated and spent by the federal government since the Watergate era. And it’s a problem only Congress can fix.
You’ve probably never heard of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. Don’t feel bad. Apparently, neither have the members of the 112th Congress.
The Impoundment Control Act was passed by Congress to punish Richard Nixon for Watergate. It effectively took away the long-standing power of the president to impound federal dollars even though they had been allocated by Congress.
Presidents since Jefferson had used their power to impound money, put it in a fund and spend it in a future fiscal year. Forty-three governors today have the same power to impound money their state legislatures allocate.
For about 170 years the president’s impoundment power was an effective way to keep federal budgets balanced or to prevent Congress from spending money on dumb or unnecessary projects.
Then came Watergate and the Impoundment Control Act. Since then Congress has given itself a blank check to spend money the government didn’t have. Did it matter? Are you kidding?
In 1974, the federal budget deficit was $6.1 billion. One year after the Impoundment Control Act was made law, the deficit was $53 billion. By the time my father Ronald Reagan became president, it was $79 billion.
There’s only one way to prevent future GSA scandals and end our massive budget deficits. Cut back the total amount of money the federal government spends.
Paul Ryan is right. When government agencies have enough money to spend on $850,000 junkets, we’re putting too much money in their checkbooks.
So don’t put the biggest blame on the GSA bureaucrats. Put it on Congress. It’s Congress’ job to slash the budget money the GSA and other bloated, over-funded and unnecessary federal agencies get in the first place.
Instead of holding hearings to see who can express the most outrage at the GSA’s waste, Congress’ spendthrifts should go back and read the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. Then they should repeal it.
Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political consultant, and the author of “The New Reagan Revolution” (St. Martin’s Press, 2011). He is the founder and chairman of The Reagan Group and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his website at http://www.reagan.com, or e-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.
Cagle Post » Blame Congress for the GSA Scandal.
Related articles
- Congress: Republican led House wants to amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 – the Senate comes back 1/9 (ynative77.wordpress.com)
- Chuck Colson, Watergate figure and Christian ministry founder, reportedly near death (abcnews.go.com)
- CBO – Unauthorized Appropriations and Expiring Authorizations (bespacific.com)
- Sons of Watergate [George Emsden] (ecademy.com)
- Bernstein: John Paul II a pillar of 20th century (timesleader.com)
- Weekly Basket: Tempest in a Teapot (gloucestercitynews.net)
- Watergate figure Chuck Colson reportedly near death (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
- Nixon’s Clean Water Act Impoundment Power Play (ecocentricblog.org)
- Watergate by Thomas Mallon (nochargebookbunch.com)
- Watergate figure Charles Colson in grave condition (kansascity.com)






Recent Comments