Posts Tagged Boston
Why Cell Phone Bans Don’t Work – ScienceNOW
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Perspective, Society, Technology on August 22, 2012
Why Cell Phone Bans Don’t Work
by Carol Cruzan Morton on 22 August 2012
![]()
It’s the driver. People who talk on cell phones tend to be more unsafe drivers, says a new study from MIT that included a test drive.
Credit: Nathan Fried-Lipski/MIT AgeLab
You can take the driver away from the cell phone, but you can’t take the risky behavior away from the driver. That’s the conclusion of a new study, which finds that people who talk on their phones while driving may already be unsafe drivers who are nearly as prone to crash with or without the device. The findings may explain why laws banning cell phone use in motor vehicles have had little impact on accident rates.
The study involved 108 people, equally divided into three age groups: 20s, 40s, and 60s. For each person, the researchers correlated answers on a questionnaire with data collected from on-board sensors during a 40-minute test drive up Interstate 93 north of Boston. The drivers commanded a black Volvo SUV tricked out with an eye tracker, heart and skin monitors, video cameras facing out the front and back windows, on-board sensors, and other research gear.
No cell phones were allowed during these trips. Instead, before they got behind the wheel, the study participants filled in answers about how often they used a cell phone while driving, how they felt about speeding and passing other cars, and how many times in the last year they had been warned or cited for speeding, running traffic lights and stop signs, and other infractions. The team grouped the participants into “frequent users” (those who talked on the phone while driving a few times a week or more) and “rare users” (those who talked while driving a few times a month or less).
Compared with people who rarely talked as they steered, frequent cell phone users drove faster, changed lanes more frequently, spent more time in the left lane, and engaged in more hard braking maneuvers and rapid accelerations, according to the SUV’s onboard equipment. Frequent cell phone users, for example, zoomed along about 4.4 kilometers per hour faster on average and changed lanes twice as often, compared with rare users.
“These are not ‘oh-my-god’ differences,” says study leader Bryan Reimer, a human factors engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge. “They are subtle clues indicative of more aggressive driving.” What’s more, he says, other studies have linked these behaviors to an increased rate of crashes. “It’s clear [from the scientific literature] that cell phones in and of themselves impair the ability to manage the demands of driving,” Reimer says. But “the fundamental problem may be the behavior of the individuals willing to pick up the technology.”
The findings, reported online this month in Accident Analysis & Prevention, provide one plausible explanation for why injuries and fatalities from motor vehicle crashes have decreased to historic lows even as cellular technology use has increased dramatically. They may also explain another mystery. “Cell phone bans have reduced cell phone use by drivers, but the perplexing thing is that they haven’t reduced crashes,” says Russ Rader, a spokesperson for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in Arlington, Virginia, who was not involved in the new study. In two other studies, the institute has found no reduction in crashes due to hand-held cell phone or texting bans, based on insurance claim rates in states with and without the laws.
The findings may help explain why legislation banning mobile phone use has had little measurable impact on overall crash rates, speculate the study authors. “There is no question in anyone’s mind that talking on a cell phone increases risk,” Reimer says. “It’s great we can take the phone out of their hands, but these may be the drivers who are getting in accidents anyway.”
“We have seen the same correlations in our Traffic Safety Culture Index,” says Peter Kissinger, president and CEO of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, an independently funded charitable research and education organization established by the American Automobile Association. The index surveys more than 3100 people each year. The foundation wants to change driver behavior, a challenge more complex than banning phones, he says.
Still, cell phone bans may save lives, says David Strayer, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. “The MIT data indicate that regulation [banning cell phone use] may be reasonable so long as it is followed up with good enforcement, and that together these would result in a decrease in unsafe driving behavior.”
Why Cell Phone Bans Don’t Work – ScienceNOW.
Related articles
- Why Cell Phone Bans Don’t Work (news.sciencemag.org)
- How to Conform to the New FMSCA’s Hand-Held Cell Phone Ban for CMV Drivers (smartsign.com)
- Cell Phone Ban Proposed in Mission (fox4kc.com)
- Launching an Effective Cell Phone Ban Inside Your Company (themarlincompany.com)
- Judge overturns Chapel Hill cell-phone ban (newsobserver.com)
- Leaving Your Cell Phone Behind: Great Idea? Or Greatest Idea? (kcet.org)
- There Oughta Be a Law: California May Ban Texting While Biking (blogs.lawyers.com)
- Put Your iPhone Down And You’ll Get Cheap Eats At This L.A. Resto (refinery29.com)
- $106 Ticket for Drivers wo Violate Cellphone Ban In Beachwood! (newstalkcleveland.com)
News from The Associated Press
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in GOP on August 18, 2012
|
ROMNEY WANTS RUNNING MATE TO PLAY IT SAFE, FOR NOW BY STEVE PEOPLES |
||||||||
GLEN ALLEN, Va. (AP) — Mitt Romney wants running mate Paul Ryan to play it safe. Ryan, the nation’s most controversial budget architect, is often described as the intellectual leader of the House Republican caucus. But Romney’s presidential campaign headquarters in Boston seems, for now, to prefer that the 42-year-old father of three talks about camping and milking cows instead of the fiscal proposals that made him a conservative hero. Ryan, who wrote a plan to overhaul Medicare as chairman of the House Budget Committee, did not use the word “Medicare” with voters over the first four days as the vice presidential candidate. When he finally touched on the health care insurance program for seniors, he did so only in broad strokes after Romney himself first outlined the campaign’s talking points. “We will not duck the tough issues,” Ryan said Friday in Virginia. “We will lead.” But Ryan has been directed to avoid taking questions from reporters who travel with him, and to agree only to a few carefully selected interviews. He is known for sketching budget graphs on napkins to explain his ideas, but this past week it was Romney who used a white board during a news conference to help detail his own plan – one he says is virtually identical to Ryan’s. “I’m joining the Romney ticket,” Ryan told an Ohio television station this week. “It’s not the other way around. So I’m supporting the Mitt Romney plan.” Some of the Republican Party’s most passionate voters see it a different way. Reluctant to support Romney during the GOP primary, they favor Ryan and his ideas more than the former Massachusetts governor who will head the party’s ticket. Romney hopes that Ryan’s conservative credentials and his boyish enthusiasm will help him solidify support from the base of his party and close the “likability gap” with President Barack Obama, who remains relatively popular in spite of the nation’s struggling economy. Yet Romney does not want Ryan’s plans to overshadow his own candidacy. Advisers suggest that Ryan’s role will change over time. He is eager to do more, and a week after his selection became official, there are already signs that he’s beginning to play a more active role. The congressman visited a retirement village in Florida on Saturday and emphasized that the plans he has pushed in Congress are designed to save Medicare, not end it. Introducing his mother, a Medicare recipient, to the crowd, the candidate spoke about what the program has meant to his family and said that “we have to keep that guarantee.” But in taking up the issue, he did not lay out the complexities of his proposals to let future retirees choose alternatives to traditional Medicare. Romney’s campaign managers want him to proceed with caution. Romney’s team remembers well the problems caused by running mates who may have been trusted prematurely to play a prominent role in a presidential race – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in 2008 and Sen. Dan Quayle in 1988, among them. The Republican presidential campaign has gone to great lengths to remind voters that Romney’s way rules. Before Ryan first addressed Medicare in Ohio this week, large signs were placed in front of and behind the podium reading, “The Romney Plan.” After spending his first two days campaigning with Romney, Ryan will be at his side again in the week ahead for at least one campaign appearance. The candidates, labeled as “America’s Comeback Team” in Romney’s campaign signs, are set to appear together in New Hampshire’s largest city on Monday. It is expected to be first of what may be many joint appearances in the coming days. When they are together, the gregarious Ryan helps Romney shed his sometimes wooden ways, and they seem to draw larger crowds together than Romney does on his own. Just don’t expect Ryan to start charting his Medicare plans on stage. His proposal to turn the guaranteed health care program for people 65 and over into a voucher-like system creates significant political challenges for the Romney-Ryan ticket – and for Republicans across the country. Many seniors don’t fully understand the proposal, and Obama’s re-election campaign is aggressively condemning the plan as something that would “end Medicare as we know it.” That’s largely why Romney is easing Ryan into the debate. While Ryan explained his complicated plans at length during dozens of Medicare town hall-style meetings before becoming Romney’s running mate, those kinds of meetings probably are over because they’re considered too politically dangerous to continue. Instead, Ryan is being encouraged to discuss his young children, his working-class background and his love of the outdoors as the American people get to know him. “Let’s play stump the running mate later. Right now I want to enjoy the fair,” Ryan said when asked about Medicare at the Iowa State Fair. “We do cow-milking contests in Wisconsin,” he continued. “I usually lose to a 17-year-old woman who grew up on a dairy farm, who’s wearing like a sash and tiara.” Despite the cautious approach, Romney’s advisers are expecting Ryan to stumble at times early on as his record faces unprecedented scrutiny. Already, some concerns have popped up. He reversed course on Thursday and acknowledged lobbying the government for stimulus money after twice denying he had done so. The admission came only after the release of letters, with his signature, asking for millions of the program’s dollars on behalf of two companies in his home state. And while he has tried to avoid diving into the specifics of his Medicare plan, a reporter pushed him to explain an apparent contradiction during an impromptu lunch meeting in Ohio. In the interview, Ryan said he never would have included a $700 billion Medicare cut in his budget if Obama hadn’t done it first. “He put those cuts there,” Ryan said of the president. “We would never have done it in the first place.” The defense represented a deviation from the Romney campaign’s talking points and overshadowed what was supposed to be a made-for-TV stop at local hotdog restaurant. |
News from The Associated Press.
Related articles
- Romney Wants His Risky Pick to Play It Safe (abcnews.go.com)
- Romney wants his risky pick to play it safe (news.yahoo.com)
- Romney wants his risky pick to play it safe (utsandiego.com)
- Ryan’s first V.P. flip-flop – Salon.com (mbcalyn.com)
- Romney wants his risky pick to play it safe (kansascity.com)
- Ryan on Medicare: ‘We will win this debate’ (cnsnews.com)
- Mitt Romney Wants Paul Ryan To Talk About Cows Instead Of Transformational Budget Proposals (dekerivers.wordpress.com)
- Romney has picked Paul Ryan as running mate, Republican source tells the AP (foxnews.com)
- Romney stumbles badly on Medicare (maddowblog.msnbc.com)
- Romney, Obama Fight for Medicare (abcnews.go.com)
What Facebook Hands Over To Police When A User Is Suspected Of Murder – Forbes
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Facebook, Law on August 7, 2012
What Facebook Hands Over To Police When A User Is Suspected Of Murder

Phil Markoff’s Facebook file, via the Boston Phoenix
The Boston Phoenix has a pretty fascinating and detailed story about the digital detective work involved in tracking down Phil Markoff, a.k.a. the Craigslist Killer. After looking for evidence in the Marriott hotel room where the first erotic masseuse victim was found and going through the victim’s cell phone to contact friends and relatives, the Boston Police Department turned to the somewhat controversial technique, recently brought into the spotlight by the ACLU, of location-tracking cell phones for help with the investigation.
After a second attack at a Westin Hotel, some FBI agents who happened to be passing through helped the Boston police to “pull cell-tower records for the time period 15 minutes before and after each incident, for those near the scene of each crime.” They tried to pinpoint a phone that was used in both areas around the times of the attack, but they wound up with hundreds of phone numbers. So, it was basically a dead end.
What wound up being much more useful was the email address that Markoff used to contact his first victim. It was a throw-away hotmail account, but Microsoft was able to give the police the IP address of the person who opened it (after getting a subpoena), while Comcast was able to supply the name and physical address of the person associated with the IP (also after receiving a subpoena).
That’s when the police turned to Facebook. They sent a subpoena to the social networking giant and got a 60+ page dossier on Markoff, including all of his wall posts, the photos he’d been tagged in, a list of his friends, and a history of his log-ins (with associated IP information). It doesn’t seem to have actually been that helpful in the investigation, but it makes for an interesting perusal. (The police also asked Facebook for its records on Markoff’s oblivious but seemingly innocent fiance.)
In posting the Facebook file, the Phoenix headlined it, “When the cops subpoena your Facebook information, here’s what Facebook sends the cops.” That’s incorrect given what Facebook says are its practices these days. This investigation was conducted back in 2008. The police department wouldn’t be able to get that much information today with just a subpoena (an official request from a law enforcement or government agency that hasn’t been reviewed by a judge). When I interviewed Facebook’s director of security, Joe Sullivan, earlier this year, he told me the company provides only “basic subscriber information” in response to a subpoena, meaning a user’s name, e-mail address and IP address. Sullivan said that, to get a peek at a user’s photos, status updates, private messages, friend lists, or pokes, law enforcement has to get a search warrant, making things a little harder for investigators but protecting users from fishing expeditions that haven’t gotten a judicial stamp of approval.
None of this meticulously-collected evidence wound up being used to try Markoff, though, because he committed suicide after being charged.
Hunting the Craigslist Killer [The Phoenix]
What Facebook Hands Over To Police When A User Is Suspected Of Murder – Forbes.
Related articles
- Here’s what a Facebook response to a user data subpoena looks like (nextlevelofnews.com)
- Not on Facebook? You’re probably a psychopath (theweek.co.uk)
- NYPD To Subpoena Twitter To Find User Who Threatens Aurora-Type Theater Shooting In Manhattan (ibtimes.com)
- Are People Who Don’t Use Facebook Psychopaths? (fox4kc.com)
- Missing murder suspect now on ‘Most Wanted’ list (bostonherald.com)
- Be Careful what you say here ! (pintwister.wordpress.com)
- Are You a Psychopath if You’re Not on Facebook? Some Employers, Psychiatrists Think So (mashable.com)
- Police allege vampire murder as revenge (bigpondnews.com)
- Sex Tech: Porn filesharing suits go too far, Anonymous vs. pedos (zdnet.com)
- Man extradited over Vic ‘vampire’ murder (bigpondnews.com)
Moving To New City To Solve All Of Area Man’s Problems | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Humor/Parody, The Onion on June 26, 2012
Moving To New City To Solve All Of Area Man’s Problems
ATLANTA—All of area resident Brian Shepard’s problems, including his fear of commitment, lack of personal direction, and inability to learn from past failures, will be instantly solved this week when the 29-year-old packs up his belongings and moves to a new city. “Moving to Portland is going to make all the difference in the world,” said Shepard, who, just by putting 2,500 miles distance between himself and years of destructive behavior, will suddenly turn his life around. “It won’t be anything like Chicago, or Boston, or San Francisco. This is exactly what I need right now.” Shepard also plans to completely eliminate his dependence on self-denial by ignoring his dependence on self-denial.
![]()
Moving To New City To Solve All Of Area Man’s Problems | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source.
Related articles
- Romney Stares Uncomprehendingly At $1 Bill | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- New Internet Destinations Created | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- Justice Department Sues 2 Polygamous Communities | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source | American Voices (mbcalyn.com)
- Report: Baseball Favorite Sport Of Many Detroit Tigers Players | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- Phil Mickelson’s Shower Caddy Recommends Sudsy 9-Iron | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- Eating Disorders Common Among Older Women | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source | American Voices (mbcalyn.com)
- Entire Facebook Staff Laughs As Man Tightens Privacy Settings | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (futureofbiz.org)
- Governor Too Embarrassed To Say Which State He Leads | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- Tired Twins Ask If They Can Stop Swinging Bat All The Way Around | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
- Wrigley Field Supporters Propose Tearing Down Rest Of Chicago | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source (mbcalyn.com)
Free Wood Post
Posted by Michael B. Calyn in Free Wood Post, Humor/Parody on June 24, 2012
Mother Nature: What Do I Have to Do Here to Convince You Assholes That Global Warming is Real?

Mother Nature released a statement this week expressing frustration with the increasingly poor treatment the earth has been subjected to at the hands of its human inhabitants.
Environmental activists were stunned by the release of the statement, which is believed to be the first of its kind.
“Seriously, folks,” it began. “What do I have to do to get your attention here? Do you want me to melt the polar ice caps into the shape of a giant frowny-face? Should I strike down a couple thousand starving polar bears so that their prone bodies spell out the words ‘turn off your fucking air conditioner’ or maybe ‘stop driving six blocks to work in your damn Hummers’?”
Many scientists believe that the growing human population, coupled with modern man’s increasingly destructive and rapacious consumption of dwindling natural resources, have contributed significantly to a number of serious environmental issues, with global warming at the forefront.
However, many political conservatives continue to ignore mounting scientific evidence that climate change is an issue, insisting instead that the gradually warming temperatures across the planet are part of a larger, natural temperature cycle.
Mother Nature’s statement appeared to address this controversy head-on.
“You want a few more ninety-degree days in January up in Minnesota?” it asked. “Did you like those? Did they feel right? And what about that earthquake in D.C. last year? Did you somehow think that was a good sign? Can I maybe send a few more devastating tsunamis your way? Just tell me what kind of natural disaster you’re going to have to experience in order to finally stop destroying a hundred different species every single day, and I’ll get right on it.”
Mother Nature then went on a tangential rant in which she apologized for her attempt to destroy British Petroleum, which had unfortunately “backfired really badly”, and noted that Morgan Freeman’s voice-overs for several recent nature documentaries were “impeccably done” and “really some of his best work.”
“Anyway, please let me know what it’s going to take to get you to cool it with the hydraulic fracturing already,” the statement concluded. “I thought the byproduct of flammable water would be a pretty clear indication that fracking was a bad idea, but I guess I was wrong there too.
“I’ve tried every way I can think of to send a message to you, but apparently we’re just not speaking the same language anymore.
“Stay cool, guys,” the Mother Nature said ominously in closing, adding, “Don’t say I didn’t warn you.”
As of press time, Mother Nature was unavailable for further comment, and it was an unusually hot 94 degrees in Boston.
Related articles
- Global warming is un-bear-able for polar bears stranded on ice (thesun.co.uk)
- How Do We Know Global Warming Is Not a Natural Cycle? (climatecentral.org)
- global warming kids information (mervinbyrne.typepad.com)
- Leading Global Warming Advocate Recants! … ‘Models Fail Dramatically …’ (thedailybell.com)
- Branson confronted about whether he supports European carbon tax on his airline… (nationalreview.com)
- The Polarizing Poles: Yet Another Study Shows That More Knowledgeable Conservatives Are *Worse* on Global Warming (desmogblog.com)
- The Shrinking Polar Ice Caps (zazenlife.com)
- Green ‘drivel’ exposed. The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate change hysteria (investmentwatchblog.com)
- Joe Bastardi Challenges Jeff Master’s Claims About Sunspots (stevengoddard.wordpress.com)
- It just gets thicker and deeper: UN Warns of Global Collapse Due to Pesticides; Agenda 21 is Pushed as Solution (junkscience.com)



Recent Comments